Assignment Task
view longer description
High Distinction
Outstanding because it is a comprehensive and concise synopsis of the consumer and an informed rationale for applying the intervention
Distinction
Excellent because it is a comprehensive synopsis of the consumer you are working with and an informed rationale for utilising this intervention with this consumer
Credit
Relevant and informed synopsis of the consumer you are working with and a rationale for utilising this intervention with this consumer.
Pass
Synopsis of the consumer you are working with and a rationale for utilising this intervention with this consumer.
Fail
Inadequately informed and/or inconcise synopsis of the consumer you are working with and rationale for utilising this intervention with this consumer.
High Distinction
Outstanding because it is comprehensive and concise description of the components of the criterion
Distinction
Excellent because it is a concise synopsis of the components of the criterion
Credit
Relevant and informed description of the components of the criterion
Pass
A description of the process of engagement that meets the components of the criterion
Fail
An inadequate synopsis and description of the process of engagement and how the therapeutic relationship was established and maintained.
High Distinction
Outstanding because it is a comprehensively and insightfully critique and analysis that meets the criterion requirements
Distinction
Excellent as it is a comprehensive critique and analysis that meets the criterion requirements
Credit
Relevant and appropriately informed critique and analysis of how this therapeutic intervention was utilised or intended to be used that meets the components of the criterion
Pass
Satisfactorily informed critique and analysis of how this therapeutic intervention was utilised or intended to be used against the relevant literature that meets the criterion requirements
Fail
Inadequate critique and analysis of how this therapeutic intervention was utilised or intended to be used and and may not meet all of the criterion requirements
High Distinction
Outstanding because it is a comprehensive and insightful contextual overview of skill development in using the psychosocial intervention, how practice will change and how skills will be developed further.
Distinction
Excellent as it is a comprehensive contextual overview of skill development in using the psychosocial intervention, how practice will change and how skills will be developed further.
Credit
Informed overview of skill development in using the psychosocial intervention, how practice will change and how skills will be developed further.
Pass
Overview of skill development in using the psychosocial intervention, how practice will change and how skills will be developed further.
Fail
Minimal to no overview of skill development in using the psychosocial intervention, how practice will change or how skills will be developed further
High Distinction
Exemplary writing with very high levels of authenticity and independent thought. Ideas and reasoning are clearly expressed. Introductory sentence used at the start of paragraphs. Main subject matter is developed within each paragraph. Concluding sentence used at the end of paragraphs. Exemplary spelling, grammar and syntax with no errors. Meets all style requirements.
Distinction
Evidence of superior academic writing skills. Authentic and original writing that clearly synthesises the key points of the assignment. Expression of ideas and reasoning is clear. Correct use of paragraphs. Discussion in each paragraph provides sufficient depth to demonstrate understanding. Superior spelling, grammar and syntax < 5>
Credit
Evidence of sound academic writing. Authentic and original writing that clearly addresses the key points of the assignment. Expression of ideas and reasoning is satisfactory. Paragraphs are 5-7 sentences in length and sentences are clear and concise. Minor errors only in syntax, spelling and grammar. Meets all style requirements.
Pass
Authentic writing that attempts to show independent thought. May struggle with expression of ideas and reasoning. Attempts to use paragraphs. Some sentences may be too long/short. Meets almost all style requirements including spacing, page numbers, font, headings.
Fail
Lacks authenticity. Language hinders the effective flow of ideas and meaning. Sentences lack structure and are consistently too short or too long. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar and style. Not structured as per requirements in Course Outline.
High Distinction
Sources are appropriate, contemporary and from a range of journals and databases. Complies with all the referencing style requirements. There are no errors in referencing throughout.
Distinction
Sources are appropriate, contemporary and from a range of journals and databases. APA 7 referencing style is consistently accurate. Less than 5 minor referencing errors.
Credit
Sources are appropriate, mostly contemporary and from a narrow range of journals and databases. Complies with referencing style requirements. Some referencing errors in in-text and/or referencing list (5-7).
Pass
Sources are mostly relevant however there are too few to demonstrate wide reading. Attempts to use APA 7 style. Some errors in in-text and/or referencing list (8-10).
Fail
Sources are inappropriate and/or absent. In-text referencing and/or reference list contains major errors