Describing an argument used in an issue or debate.

Unit Outcomes and Assessment Standards

Arguments in Action

Outcome 1

1 Analyse arguments by:

1.1 Describing an argument used in an issue or debate

1.2 Distinguishing the conclusion from the premises of the argument

1.3 Identifying any hidden premises

1.4 Presenting the argument in standard form

Outcome 2

2 Evaluate the reliability of arguments by:

2.1 Explaining whether the premises of an argument are reasonable

2.2 Identifying any fallacies

2.3 Evaluating whether the premises are enough to reliably draw the conclusion

Arguments in Action

Outcome 1

1 Apply knowledge and understanding of arguments, by:

1.1 Explaining the difference between statements and arguments, with reference to an example

1.2 Explaining the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning, with reference to an example

1.3 Explaining a key philosophical technique, in depth and with reference to an example

1.4 Explaining a philosophical fallacy, in depth and with reference to an example

Outcome 2

2. Evaluate arguments, by:

2.1 Analysing an argument from an issue or debate, in depth and with reference to a source

2.2 Explaining a fallacy or philosophical technique in an argument from an issue or debate, in depth and with reference to a source

2.3 Presenting an argument from an issue or debate using an argument diagram

2.4 Expressing a reasoned and well-structured judgement on the success of an argument from an issue or debate

What does the branch of philosophy called epistemology study?