Examining the Role of Logos in Communication: Insights from Ancient Rhetoric

According to the text, a communication symbol is a device "which allows us to talk about things when they are not actually present" (Osborn 2). In other words, a communication symbol is a tool used for describing objects that are not exactly tangible. The "miracle of language" brings purpose into our lives. A communication symbol contributes to the “miracle of language" by giving substance to our purpose in life. Personally, I have thought about communication in this same manor. Through communication, human beings are able to maintain meaningful relationships and connections.

According to Gorgias, "if we cannot know the truth, then we cannot possibly communicate about it" (Gorgias). What Gorgias means by this is how can we speak of something, when we know nothing about it. Protagoras stated that "if people often differ in their perceptions of issues, and "right" and "wrong" are products of a point of view, then one should be more broad-minded in understanding the commitments of others" (Protagoras). According to the previous statement, “right” and “wrong” are subjective to the beliefs of different individuals. Protagoras believed that man cannot capture truth. The idea that "humans make their own truth" is central to the nature of communication because, this is the most beneficial way that view points and ideas are shared.

Thrasymachus thought that emphasizing presentation skills and using impressive language was stronger than actual content. I only partially agree with Thrasymachus because, this strategy varies from situation to situation. In some cases, it is appropriate to cast a "smoke screen" and win over an audience by using impressive language. There are several classes of people that follow the views of Thrasymachus. In politics for instance, several speeches are given from people in positions of power. But not all of them have substantial or even beneficial information.