LIN136/LIN138 Promoting Collaborative Practice For Inclusion Assessment Brief 2026 | LINC
Publish By:
Admin,
Last Updated:
20-Apr-26
Price:
$150
| Category | Assignment | Subject | Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Leadership for INClusion in the Early Years (LINC) | Module Title | LIN136/LIN138 Promoting Collaborative Practice For Inclusion |
LIN136/LIN138 Assessment Brief
As part of your End of Module Assessment for this Module, you will create a PowerPoint Presentation with a Voiceover based on the below topic:
“Promoting collaborative practice through the voice of the child”.
Your presentation should demonstrate your understanding of collaborative practice in Early Learning and Care (ELC) and/or School Age Childcare (SAC) and show how children’s voices can inform and shape practice.
Your PowerPoint presentation should demonstrate:
- Foundations of collaborative practice using a bioecological and rights-based approach
- How you use reflective practice and action research to support collaboration
- How you support family-centred, culturally responsive and participatory collaboration
You should link with theory and practice throughout your presentation.
Your PowerPoint presentation should include:
- A short introduction slide
- An explanation of the topic and why it is important
- How collaborative practice through the voice of the child happens in an ELC and/or SAC setting. You might consider encouraging agency, promoting their voice, a rights-based approach, working collaboratively with families and children to support children’s perspective
- An example of one collaborative change you have made in your ELC and/or SAC setting linked to promoting collaborative practice, using the what, how and why framework
- A reflection on the collaborative change in promoting collaborative practice (what worked well, what you learned and what you might do differently)
- Links with literature and practice throughout
- A short concluding slide
Conventions For The PowerPoint Presentation:
- 10-12 slides
- Voice over on each slide to total of 10 minutes
- Use Times New Roman, Arial, Tahoma, or Calibri, size 24
- Ensure slides are clear, organised and easy to follow
- Use UL Harvard Referencing for all sources.
- Reference all work that is not your own.
- Discussion and collaboration are encouraged, but the assessment must be your own work
- Do not include real photographs of children, families or your setting, you can use PowerPoint graphics or copyright-free images only.
A Reference List must be included. This does not need to be included in the Voiceover Recording.
Please complete and upload your assessment to Moodle by 2pm on Monday 27th of April 2026.
LIN136/LIN138 Assessment Rubric
| Rubric Area | Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
| Introduction 1 slide:
Introduce your topic, explain what will be discussed in each section |
A very clear, well explained and
carefully organised introd uction. It clearly explains the key areas and purpose of the assignment and what each section will discuss. Flows smoothly and captures the reader’s attention. |
A clear and mostly well organised introduc tion. Explains the key areas and gives a good outline of the structure. Well, organis ed with only minor areas that could be refined. | Mostly clear introdu ction but needs better organisation i n sections. An adequate introducti on where elements of the main ideas are considered. Key areas are evident, b ut parts may not be fully explained. | Understandable but sometimes unclear introduction. Provid es limited explanation and key areas that may be missing or not fully outlined.
|
No introduction is provided. Unclear or no explanation of key areas.
|
| Section 1 2 slides:
Foundations of Collaborative Practice. |
A very clear, well explained and carefully organised explan ation of collaborative practice foundations using bioecological and rightsbased
perspectives. Effective use of links to relevant literature and practice. |
A clear and mostly well organised explanat ion of collaborative practice foundations using bioecological and rights-based perspectives. Clear use of literature and practice. | Mostly clear explan ation of collaborative practice foundations using bioecological and rights-based perspectives. Reasonable use of literature and/or practice. | Understandable but sometimes unclear explanation of collaborative practice foundations using bioecological and rights-based perspectives. Limited or basic use of literature and/or practice. | No explanation of c ollaborative practice foundations using bioecological and rights-based perspectives. No links to literature and/or practice. |
| Section 2
2 Slides: Change in Practice using the what how and why framework. |
A very clear, well explained and carefully organised explan ation of one
meaningful change imple mented using the what, how and why framework. Effective use of links to relevant literature and practice.
|
A clear and mostly well organised explana tion of one meaningful change imp lemented using the what, how and why framework. Clear use of literature and practice. | Mostly clear explanation of one
meaningful change implemented using the what, how and why framework. Reason able use of literature and/or practice. |
Understandable but sometimes unclear explanation of one meaningful change implemented using the what, how and why framework. Limite d or basic use of literature and/or practice. | No explanation of one meaningful change implemented using the what, how and why framework. No link s to literature and/or practice. |
| Section 3: 2 slides Family centred,
culturally responsive and partici patory collaboration |
A very clear, well explained and carefully organised explan ation of how practice supports families, participation and culturally
responsiveness. Effective use of links to relevant literature and practice. |
A clear and mostly well organised explanation of how practice supports families, participation and culturally responsiveness. Clear use of literature and practice. | Mostly clear explanation of how practice supports families, participation and culturally responsiveness. Re asonable use of literature and/or practice. | Understandable but sometimes unclear explanation of how practice supports families, participation and culturally responsiveness. Lim ited or basic use of literature and/or practice. | No explanation of how practice supports families, participation and culturally responsiveness. No links to literature and/or practice. |
| Section 4: 2 slides
Write a short reflection on the change made to promote the voice of the child in collaborative practice |
A very clear, well explained and carefully organised reflecti on on the change made to promote the voice of the child in collaborative practice. | A clear and mostly well organised reflectio n on the change made to the environment to promote the voice of the child in collaborative practice. | Mostly clear reflection needs better organisation on one change made to the environment to promote the voice of the child in collaborative practice . | Understandable but sometimes unclear reflection o n one change made to the environment to promote the voice of the child in collaborative practice. | No reflection was provided on one change made to the environment to promote the voice of the child in collaborative practice. |
| Conclusion: 1 Slide
|
A clear, wellorganised conclusion that effectively summarise s the key points of the assignment. It provides thoughtful remarks that highlight the value of what was learned. | A clear conclusion that summarises the ke y points of the assignment. Includes remarks that highlight learning with minor areas to be expanded or clarified. | A conclusion that summarises so me key points of the assignment. The summary and remarks on learning may be general or partially developed. | A brief conclusion that partially summarise s the assignment. Shows limited learning, and the summary may be incomplete or unclear. | No conclusion is provided, or it does not summarise the assignment, showing learning.
|
| Referencing | All sources are correctly referenced using Harvard Style. The reference list is complete and has no errors. | Most sources are correctly referenced with only a few minor errors. Reference list is complete. | Shows a good attempt to reference sources in Harvard Style. Some errors or missing information are present
|
Many reference erro rs or key information are missing.
|
No references or reference list provid ed.
|
| Voiceover | Clear, confident voice over that explains slides, demonstrates unde rstanding and stay within time | Clear voice over with minor issues | Generally clear but sometimes reading slides or lacking depth | Difficult to follow or little explanation | Voiceover missing or unclear |
